HTC Desire
| Brand |
HTC HTCSmartphones |
|---|---|
| Model name | Desire |
| Other names | Bravo, A8181 |
| Announced |
1Q 2010 (16 years 6 months ago) |
| Type | Touch |
| Dimensions | 119.00 x 60.00 x 11.90 mm |
| Weight | 135.00 g |
| Colour |
|
| Display |
Color / Super LCD 16,7 millions colors 480 x 800 px (3.70") 252 ppi ∼54.6% screen-to-body ratio |
| Display protection | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Talk time (max.) |
2G: 400 min. (6.7 h) 3G: 390 min. (6.5 h) |
| Stand-by (max.) |
2G: 340 h (14.2 days) 3G: 360 h (15.0 days) |
| Standard battery | Li-Ion 1400 mAh |
| Quick battery charging |
|
| Charger included in the package |
|
| Wireless battery charging |
|
| Internal memory | 512 MB |
| RAM memory | 576 MB |
| Memory cards |
|
| Operating system | Android 2.1 Eclair |
| Processor |
Qualcomm QSD8250
Processor clock: 1.00 GHz Number of cores: 1 GPU: Adreno 200 |
| Standards |
GSM, UMTS
read more
|
| Touchscreen |
|
| DualSIM |
|
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
We do our best to present the proper and current information on this page. However, in case of finding any error in the data above please
Piterko
The phone was purchased in the autumn of 2010 (Play subscription) and served for about 2-2.5 years, and it would have continued to serve if not for the rapidly developing technology. The physical buttons and the trackball in this version performed very well; it was comfortable and pleasant to use and made navigation much easier. The software, or rather the interface, was always a strong advantage of HTC from those years, as it looked nice and operated relatively well. The display reproduced the colors of the photos well, and the photos themselves were also of good quality. From a long-term perspective, the memory was a downside (although it was quite a lot at that time): rapidly increasing application sizes and the inability to uninstall some of them (e.g., Twitter) meant that over time, some necessary ones had to be abandoned. That is simply how progress occurs. Overall, I have good memories of the phone, and the change (to another HTC) was dictated more by software limitations than by the wear and tear of the equipment. And the review itself is rather sentimental.