Nokia 6310 2021

Technical specifications

Someone rightly wrote before - a deceptive product. I also expected a continuation ( after many years ) of the iconic model Nokia 6310i. What is currently available is a low-quality absurdity. Rating after a year of use : the battery on standby lasts less than 3 days, in mountainous terrain after losing coverage it simply locks - it is necessary to turn it off and on again to receive the network signal, photos of terrible quality, which cannot be edited anyway (np. enlarged to see anything ) - but in return there are several pre-installed games at a level adequate to the whole. And that is all regarding the subject of Nokia 6310 ( 2021 ).

This should be called "Flashlight 6310". Naming this phone with the number 6310 is a scandal. After 19 years of using the sensational Nokia 6310i, I bought this thing. It has advantages: pleasant to the touch, keys (I do not like those operated by sliding fingers). Several HUGE DEFECTS! The main one is the flashlight, which often turns on by itself (e.g., after selecting a phone number to call). When I press the "up" key twice, the flashlight lights up immediately. I do not always notice it, and it consumes battery power heavily. Importantly - THE AUTOMATIC ACTIVATION OF THE FLASHLIGHT CANNOT BE DISABLED! Besides, when I want to turn off the flashlight, I have to go back TO THE VERY BEGINNING - there is no other way... A few times I had to interrupt a call because of this, because the flashlight was on... Several other significant defects. There is space for an additional sim card, but what of it, if photos cannot be saved on it? Another thing is that the photos are of terrible quality, but that is a minor detail - all in all, the phone is not for taking photos... When I press the menu key, the most important things are not at all the closest... How many times did the installation of "Opera" start after accidentally touching a key - and I do not want that... How could they give this the number 6310? But the conversation is pleasant, once you are talking. I have gotten used to it, but it is still annoying - especially that flashlight.

Unfortunately, Nokia did not meet the challenge, but this could have been expected. What they call the successor to their iconic 6310i is not even a substitute, but a poorly made product that should be removed from their portfolio. If this company had truly worked on a proprietary system and developed something that we could call a useful phone as an alternative to a smartphone, then it would be acceptable; however, given modern user requirements and smartphone capabilities, much more is expected from classic phones, otherwise they will not be able to interest customers. A classic phone with basic functions must be very well-constructed so that one can say - this phone can really distance me from a smartphone because it offers truly reliable performance, long battery life (at least 4-5 days), and interesting features that complement it. We received a phone that is simply very low quality and, due to its functionality, can at most serve as a toy for a child rather than a replacement for off-grid use. I believe the competition has learned its lessons, and we can find much better classic phones, including rugged ones that will last for many days without charging.