Oukitel WP22
| Brand |
Oukitel OukitelSmartphones |
|---|---|
| Model name | WP22 |
| Announced |
1Q 2023 (3 years 6 months ago) |
| Type | Touch |
| Waterproofness & dust-resistance | IP68, IP69K |
| Military standard | MIL-STD-810G |
| Dimensions | 174.00 x 83.50 x 19.00 mm |
| Weight | 398.00 g |
| Colour | Black |
| Display |
Color / IPS TFT 16,7 millions colors, 90 Hz 1080 x 2408 px (6.58") 401 ppi ∼71.8% screen-to-body ratio |
| Display protection |
|
| Talk time (max.) | 3G: 4500 min. (75.0 h) |
| Stand-by (max.) | 3G: 1250 h (52.1 days) |
| Playback time (max.) |
Audio: 41 h Video: 16 h |
| Standard battery | Li-Po 10000 mAh |
| Quick battery charging |
|
| Charger included in the package |
|
| Wireless battery charging |
|
| Internal memory | 256 GB |
| RAM memory | 8 GB |
| Memory cards |
|
| Operating system | Android 13 |
| Processor |
MediaTek Helio P90 MT6779
Processor clock: 2.20 GHz Number of cores: 8 GPU: IMG PowerVR GM9446 |
| Standards |
GSM, UMTS, LTE
read more
|
| Touchscreen |
|
| DualSIM |
|
| SIM card(s) | nanoSIM, nanoSIM |
| DualSIM mode | dual standby |
| Hybrid DualSIM | nanoSIM, microSD |
| EAN | 6931940722896 |
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
We do our best to present the proper and current information on this page. However, in case of finding any error in the data above please
Piotrek
So: Battery - amazing, continuous use, music, web browsing, 6 movies watched and charging once a week. Screen, sensitivity, speed of operation - no comments, 8GB RAM - performs well - the smartphone works and reacts very quickly. Weight - acceptable for a man, a substantial phone - but there is a trade-off. I feel the solid construction. I do not recommend it for a woman; it is strictly a masculine phone due to its weight.
Disadvantages - as far as I can remember - old LG L9, Sony with Walkman, Asus K550 and many others - all of them took better photos even with 8/16 mb sensors. Photos here are a failure. Sharpness - none, blurry, it takes effort to photograph something clearly for practical use. I thought I had protective film on the camera.
Fingerprint reader - a failure. I changed fingers, scans, and constant problems. Once in a while, it recognizes. Unfortunately, it is rare to unlock with a fingerprint. I have to use a PIN. For comparison, I have a Vivo Y52 as a backup - I just touch it and it is unlocked - here 5-7 attempts and nothing, locked due to too many attempts and a PIN is needed.
In summary - if I had known about these shortcomings, I would not have bought it. I do not use it for taking photos, but the attempt to take a sharp, clear photo for use to send and show something - disqualifies this camera. I have the impression it is the worst camera in my phone history. The fingerprint reader is useless. Otherwise - the phone is okay. Calls are clear and distinct, and the sound - wonderful. It is like a portable speaker, you can throw small parties. Practically no bloatware. If not for those important shortcomings - it would be a dream phone to use. But sacrificing the camera and reader for sound and battery? - I think it is not worth it.